AI-native storage
Drop in PDFs, papers, lecture notes, slides, or datasets. kbox ingests every file, pulls the full text and metadata, and indexes it — so the moment it lands, you can search it, ask about it, and build on it.
Paper
Berg, S., Kutra, D., Kroeger, T. et al.
We present ilastik, an easy-to-use interactive tool that brings machine-learning-based (bio)image analysis to end users without substantial computational expertise. It contains pre-defined workflows for image segmentation, object classification, counting and tracking. Users adapt the workflows to the problem at hand by interactively providing sparse training annotations for a nonlinear classifier. ilastik can process data in up to five dimensions (3D, time and number of channels). Its computational back end runs operations on-demand wherever possible, allowing for interactive prediction on data larger than RAM. Once the classifiers are trained, ilastik workflows can be applied to new data from the command line without further user interaction. We describe all ilastik workflows in detail, including three case studies and a discussion on the expected performance.
Your note
Strengths
Accessible interactive ML for bioimage analysis without coding. Sparse annotation (scribbles) lowers labeling burden. Supports segmentation, object classification, counting, and tracking across up to 5D data (3D + time + channels). Out-of-core, on-demand computation enables interactive prediction on datasets larger than RAM. Trained workflows can be exported and run headlessly via command line for reproducible batch processing.
Research Directions
• Active learning for interactive annotation: uncertainty-guided scribble suggestions to reduce labeling time.
• Self-supervised pretraining for 3D microscopy to reduce annotation burden.
• Hybrid deep feature integration: plug pretrained CNN/ViT features into ilastik classifier pipeline.
• Multi-resolution, coarse-to-fine inference for terabyte-scale datasets.
• Uncertainty-aware overlays to guide user corrections in real time.
• Systematic evaluation of annotation granularity (clicks vs scribbles vs outlines).
• Cross-dataset transfer and domain adaptation benchmarking.
• Standardized 5D interactive segmentation benchmark suite.
Concerns / Gaps
Limited exploration of model uncertainty calibration. Feature engineering remains largely hand-crafted. Generalization across modalities unclear. Human-in-the-loop efficiency not rigorously quantified. Scalability tradeoffs vs deep end-to-end models underexplored.
Last left off
Want to examine classifier type (random forest?) and feature stack in detail; compare to modern deep segmentation baselines and evaluate computational complexity scaling with dataset size.
Chat or click
Prefer to chat? Ask a question, request a summary, pull a citation, or kick off deep research — all in plain language. Prefer to click? The full app is right there: search, viewer, editor, and graph. Either way, it's grounded in your actual files. Not generic. Not hallucinated.
What are the main disagreements between my papers on off-target effects?
I found three distinct positions across your library:
Doench et al. 2014 and Hart et al. 2015 argue off-target effects are predictable from sequence context and can be minimized with guide RNA design.
Tsai et al. 2015 is more cautious — their GUIDE-seq data shows unexpected off-target sites missed by computational prediction.
Anzalone et al. 2019 sidesteps the debate entirely by using prime editing, which has a fundamentally different mechanism with far fewer off-targets.
Want me to pull the supporting evidence from each paper?
Which paper makes the strongest case for base editing?
Komor et al. 2016 makes the strongest case — they demonstrate base editing with 15–75% efficiency and minimal indels across 12 genomic loci. Two papers in your library build directly on this: Gaudelli et al. 2017 extends it to A·T→G·C conversions, and Anzalone et al. 2019 cites it as the foundation for prime editing.
Under the hood
Behind the single chat box are nine specialized agents. Ask, and the right one runs — across your files and the web. From your first upload to your final draft, in one place.
Search
Find anything by meaning — across every file you own.
Summarize
Any PDF, chapter, or dataset — short or exhaustive.
Study
Flashcards, quizzes, and explainers from your files.
Ideas
Grounded suggestions from your library. No hallucinating.
Tables
Auto-extracted from any PDF, ready to use.
Citations
APA, MLA, Chicago, BibTeX — one message.
Writing
Draft alongside your sources. LaTeX + markdown native.
Deep research
Agents that read across your files and the web.
Knowledge graph
Your files as a living network. Find the connection.
Learning supercharged by AI.
Students
Drop in your readings and lecture slides. Ask for summaries, flashcards, and quizzes. Understand faster.
Researchers
Search, annotate, and connect an entire library. Run deep research agents across your papers and the web.
Lifelong learners
Save anything worth remembering. Chat with your own knowledge base whenever a question comes up.
How it works
From the moment a file lands in your box to the moment you're done — AI is working.
Processing
Extracting
Recommending
Connecting
Summarizing
Saving
Intelligent research tools to accelerate your workflow
Discover
Every file, note, and idea forms a living knowledge graph. Hover a node. Find the gap. Discover the connection you didn't know was there.
*Interactive graph — only viewable on desktop
Kbox is built by Kearny Lane, a small team building AI-native file storage for students, researchers, and lifelong learners.